testing - Providing a third party with testable web services -

-

the applications follows, seen point of view:

the application making (lets call app1), , 2 third parties, app2 , app3.

  • app2: wants consume simplified web services app1
  • app1: i'm at. services app3 handled nicely here already, nice, clean internal api easy usage.
  • app3: third party service provider. complex services. important point: has no test environment, ever against done production data (although separate test account). if screw here, things happen real people in real world. lack of real test environment not in control.

app3 provides application, app1, web services. app2 wants me "forward" services in simpler manner, don't have reimplement complexities i've handled. app2, consuming web services, needs have testable version of services use while implementing side, handle different use cases themselves.

how can implemented smooth possible?

internally, relevant parts of existing application looks this:

  • presentation + web services (web application + small web api, , web service)
  • service facades services below (providing clean api services app3 provide)
  • services (parsing, mapping, logging, diagnostics soap calls app3) - sortof "data tier"

the web service fine, , talking directly service facades. leave app2 production data test services against (and service can't tested on production data, it's harsh write operation). tell ioc-container use separate implementation of relevant service facade when, example, given config parameter set. however, since i'm going "forward" limited subset of these services, leave rest of application using service facade unusable on our test environment, not thing - other stuff needs tested (even against production data).

i'm thinking introducing tier between presentation/web service tier , service facades, web service use. let ioc container dish test version of when deploying test environment.

good things it:

  • it lets me put provided web services third parties consume in testable state seen outside, can if-else different stuff internally simulate different use-cases.
  • it enables rest of application stay as-is, using actual production services app3 necessary elsewhere testing.
  • will make both testable , "real deal" versions of new tier unit testable

bad things:

  • creating layer of seemingly unnecessary complexity that's not really giving application anything
  • requiring mechanism turning on/off test mode (= more junk code/config)
  • junk-like code people might mistake being prototyping year or 2 later, trying rid of it

am thinking right thing, or there other (noticably) different solutions this?

  • send in separate parameter enable test mode? seems risky , far more work on side.

app2 [...] needs have testable version of services use while implementing side, handle different use cases themselves

it's not clear want test here.

if mean testing app2 plays app1, tend consider it's not third party component's job make "testable" - it's consumer component should test communication 3d party , verify if can handle results.

in app2, create proxy app1's services. in unit tests, can stub proxy's methods return canned test data. these data can more or less close production data depending on scenarios want cover. create integration tests between proxy , real services verify runs smoothly.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

plot - Remove Objects from Legend When You Have Also Used Fit, Matlab -

-
Image
i've plotted data points , fitted exponential curve between them using 'fit' in matlab. problem fit-function got fitted line wanted plot, markers on top of regular markers. solved problem plotting wanted markers on top of unwanted couldn't seen. problem. when want show legends dots in there. how can remove markers legend without removing fitted line since both of them hidden inside fit-function? can stop 'fit' plotting unwanted markers? so, want remove blue dot called 'hoff' in picture below. you can leave out legend-entries manually leaving out handles of lines, dont want in legend. try this: %if plot something, want showing in legend, save handle: h_line = plot(x,y) %you dont want show line? dont anything, plot it: plot(mymarker) %then set legend-> can add text legend-entries %a cell-array containing strings want show up: legend([h_line another_line],{'text1' 'text2'}) with example (see comments) came solution: ...
Read more

java - Why does my date parsing return a weird date? -

-
here code using: string string = "08/07/2013".replace('/', '-'); date date = new simpledateformat("yyyy-mm-dd").parse(string); why date return: "wen jan 3 00:00:00 est 14"? not @ date format told use. edit: need format because database using requires format. the format use parse date string, not match it. using yyyy 08 . use following format: new simpledateformat("dd-mm-yyyy") and why @ replacing / - ? can build pattern original string only: string string = "08/07/2013" date date = new simpledateformat("dd/mm/yyyy").parse(string); and if want date string in yyyy-mm-dd format, can format date using dateformat#format(date) method: string formatteddate = new simpledateformat("yyyy-mm-dd").format(date); see also: change date format in java string simpledateformat java doc
Read more

Need help in packaging app using TideSDK on Windows -

-
i developed application using tidesdk on windows , when click launchapp works fine. moved package , installed imagemagick , wix 3.0 required packaging on windows. clicked on package runtime , cannot guess packaged app is? found file 'installer' in workspace when click on it says installer not find application path . think application not being packaged properly. here log see in tidesdk: preparing package desktop app runtime. 1 moment... staging trial -> copying contents d:\lab\tidesdk\trial d:\lab\tidesdk\trial\packages\win32\bundle\trial -> copying installer c:\programdata\tidesdk\sdk\win32\1.3.1-beta\installer d:\lab\tidesdk\trial\packages\win32\bundle\trial -> copying runtime d:\lab\tidesdk\trial\packages\win32\bundle\trial -> date: d:\lab\tidesdk\trial\packages\win32\bundle\trial\modules\app\1.3.1-beta -> date: d:\lab\tidesdk\trial\packages\win32\bundle\trial\modules\codec\1.3.1-beta -> date: d:\lab\tidesdk\trial\packages\win32\bundle\trial\mod...
Read more